[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87im7xloyq.fsf@waldekranz.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:12:13 +0100
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: LAG fixes
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 15:46, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 01:24:35 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 03:02:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:52:57 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> > > The kernel test robot kindly pointed out that Global 2 support in
>> > > mv88e6xxx is optional.
>> > >
>> > > This also made me realize that we should verify that the hardware
>> > > actually supports LAG offloading before trying to configure it.
>> > >
>> > > v1 -> v2:
>> > > - Do not allocate LAG ID mappings on unsupported hardware (Vladimir).
>> > > - Simplify _has_lag predicate (Vladimir).
>> >
>> > If I'm reading the discussion on v1 right there will be a v3,
>> > LMK if I got it wrong.
>>
>> I don't think a v3 was supposed to be coming, what made you think that?
>
> I thought you concluded that the entire CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6XXX_GLOBAL2
> should go, you said:
>
>> So, roughly, you save 10%/13k. That hardly justifies the complexity IMO.
Well, based on what Andrew said, my guess is that that is where we will
end up.
But since at the moment net-next does not build for configs without
Global2-support, I would really appreciate it if this series could be
applied to solve that immediate problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists