lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210118132955.2f7c86c8@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:29:55 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        dong.menglong@....com.cn, daniel@...earbox.net, gnault@...hat.com,
        ast@...nel.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, ap420073@...il.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, jakub@...udflare.com,
        bjorn.topel@...el.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, rdna@...com, maheshb@...gle.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_wmem_default
 and sysctl_rmem_default

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:15:28 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:15:18 +0100 Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 06:23:19PM +0800, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:  
> > > From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
> > > 
> > > For now, sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default are globally
> > > unified. It's not convenient in some case. For example, when we
> > > use docker and try to control the default udp socket receive buffer
> > > for each container.
> > > 
> > > For that reason, make sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default
> > > per-namespace.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
> > > ---    
> > 
> > Hey Menglong,
> > 
> > I was about to review the two patches you sent:
> > 
> > 1. [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_rmem_max and sysctl_wmem_max
> >    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210117104743.217194-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn
> > 2. [PATCH net-next] net: core: Namespace-ify sysctl_wmem_default and sysctl_rmem_default
> >    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210117102319.193756-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn  
> 
> And perhaps
> 
>   0. [PATCH net-next] net: core: init every ctl_table in netns_core_table
> 
> ? 
> 
> I'm dropping these three from patchwork please follow Christian
> suggestions on how to repost properly, thanks!

Ah, you already did.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ