[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210118220923.7zlmtr3u4o657y7y@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:09:23 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
Cc: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, idosch@...sch.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 2/7] net: bridge: switchdev: Include local flag in
FDB notifications
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:06:16AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> And these:
>
> $ ip link add br0 type bridge
> $ ip link set swp3 master br0
> $ ip link set swp2 master br0
> $ ip link set swp1 master br0
> $ ip link set swp0 master br0
> $ bridge fdb | grep permanent
> 00:04:9f:05:de:0a dev swp0 vlan 1 master br0 permanent
> 00:04:9f:05:de:0a dev swp0 master br0 permanent
> 00:04:9f:05:de:0a dev swp3 vlan 1 master br0 permanent
> 00:04:9f:05:de:0a dev swp3 master br0 permanent
Ugh, I messed it up. The entries with swp0 are stray here. The permanent
entries get reported only for swp3 in the second case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists