lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:28:38 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...dia.com,
        nikolay@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 3/7] net: bridge: switchdev: Send FDB
 notifications for host addresses

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 02:25:11AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> Treat addresses added to the bridge itself in the same way as regular
> ports and send out a notification so that drivers may sync it down to
> the hardware FDB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
> ---

What is the functional difference between a bridge FDB entry which has
the BR_FDB_LOCAL flag, and a bridge FDB entry with a NULL fdb->dst?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ