[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <677113f7-2dd5-393a-c160-ccffc94c08c0@ucloud.cn>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:25:52 +0800
From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_flower add CT_FLAGS_INVALID flag
support
On 1/19/2021 2:21 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 01:18:47PM +0800, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> ...
>> --- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> @@ -305,6 +305,9 @@ static int fl_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tcf_proto *tp,
>> struct fl_flow_key skb_key;
>> struct fl_flow_mask *mask;
>> struct cls_fl_filter *f;
>> + bool post_ct;
>> +
>> + post_ct = qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct;
> Patch-wise, only here I think you could initialize post_ct right on
> the declaration. No need for the extra line/block of lines here.
>
> But I'm missing the iproute2 changes for flower, with a man page
> update as well. Not sure if you planned to post them later on or not,
> but it's nice to always have them paired together.
Will do . Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcelo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists