netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_flower add CT_FLAGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:25:52 +0800
From:   wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc:     jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_flower add CT_FLAGS_INVALID flag
 support


On 1/19/2021 2:21 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 01:18:47PM +0800, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> ...
>> --- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
>> @@ -305,6 +305,9 @@ static int fl_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tcf_proto *tp,
>>  	struct fl_flow_key skb_key;
>>  	struct fl_flow_mask *mask;
>>  	struct cls_fl_filter *f;
>> +	bool post_ct;
>> +
>> +	post_ct = qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->post_ct;
> Patch-wise, only here I think you could initialize post_ct right on
> the declaration. No need for the extra line/block of lines here.
>
> But I'm missing the iproute2 changes for flower, with a man page
> update as well. Not sure if you planned to post them later on or not,
> but it's nice to always have them paired together.
Will do . Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcelo
>