netdev - Re: [RFC v3 03/11] vdpa: Remove the restriction that only supports virtio-net devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210120110832.oijcmywq7pf7psg3@steredhat>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:08:32 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com, parav@...dia.com,
        bob.liu@...cle.com, hch@...radead.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        willy@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, axboe@...nel.dk,
        bcrl@...ck.org, corbet@....net,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 03/11] vdpa: Remove the restriction that only supports
 virtio-net devices

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:46:38AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>On 2021/1/19 下午12:59, Xie Yongji wrote:
>>With VDUSE, we should be able to support all kinds of virtio devices.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
>>---
>>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 29 +++--------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>index 29ed4173f04e..448be7875b6d 100644
>>--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/nospec.h>
>>  #include <linux/vhost.h>
>>  #include <linux/virtio_net.h>
>>+#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
>>  #include "vhost.h"
>>@@ -185,26 +186,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>-static int vhost_vdpa_config_validate(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>-				      struct vhost_vdpa_config *c)
>>-{
>>-	long size = 0;
>>-
>>-	switch (v->virtio_id) {
>>-	case VIRTIO_ID_NET:
>>-		size = sizeof(struct virtio_net_config);
>>-		break;
>>-	}
>>-
>>-	if (c->len == 0)
>>-		return -EINVAL;
>>-
>>-	if (c->len > size - c->off)
>>-		return -E2BIG;
>>-
>>-	return 0;
>>-}
>
>
>I think we should use a separate patch for this.

For the vdpa-blk simulator I had the same issues and I'm adding a 
.get_config_size() callback to vdpa devices.

Do you think make sense or is better to remove this check in vhost/vdpa, 
delegating the boundaries checks to get_config/set_config callbacks.

Thanks,
Stefano