[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210121174324.24127-1-tklauser@distanz.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:43:24 +0100
From: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix typo in scalar{,32}_min_max_rsh comments
s/bounts/bounds/
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 785d25392ead..d0eae51b31e4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6266,7 +6266,7 @@ static void scalar32_min_max_rsh(struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
* 3) the signed bounds cross zero, so they tell us nothing
* about the result
* If the value in dst_reg is known nonnegative, then again the
- * unsigned bounts capture the signed bounds.
+ * unsigned bounds capture the signed bounds.
* Thus, in all cases it suffices to blow away our signed bounds
* and rely on inferring new ones from the unsigned bounds and
* var_off of the result.
@@ -6297,7 +6297,7 @@ static void scalar_min_max_rsh(struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
* 3) the signed bounds cross zero, so they tell us nothing
* about the result
* If the value in dst_reg is known nonnegative, then again the
- * unsigned bounts capture the signed bounds.
+ * unsigned bounds capture the signed bounds.
* Thus, in all cases it suffices to blow away our signed bounds
* and rely on inferring new ones from the unsigned bounds and
* var_off of the result.
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists