lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:50:44 -0800
From:   "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        alexander.duyck@...il.com, edwin.peer@...adcom.com,
        dsahern@...nel.org, kiran.patil@...el.com,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, david.m.ertman@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
        Vu Pham <vuhuong@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next V9 03/14] devlink: Support add and delete devlink port

On 1/21/2021 12:52 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
>
> Extended devlink interface for the user to add and delete a port.
> Extend devlink to connect user requests to driver to add/delete
> a port in the device.
>
> Driver routines are invoked without holding devlink instance lock.
> This enables driver to perform several devlink objects registration,
> unregistration such as (port, health reporter, resource etc) by using
> existing devlink APIs.
> This also helps to uniformly use the code for port unregistration
> during driver unload and during port deletion initiated by user.
>
> Examples of add, show and delete commands:
> $ devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:06:00.0 mode switchdev
>
> $ devlink port show
> pci/0000:06:00.0/65535: type eth netdev ens2f0np0 flavour physical port 0 splittable false
>
> $ devlink port add pci/0000:06:00.0 flavour pcisf pfnum 0 sfnum 88

Do we need to specify pfnum when adding a SF port? Isn't this redundant?
Isn't there a 1:1 mapping between the pci device and a pfnum?

> pci/0000:06:00.0/32768: type eth netdev eth6 flavour pcisf controller 0 pfnum 0 sfnum 88 external false splittable false
>    function:
>      hw_addr 00:00:00:00:00:00 state inactive opstate detached
>
> $ devlink port show pci/0000:06:00.0/32768
> pci/0000:06:00.0/32768: type eth netdev eth6 flavour pcisf controller 0 pfnum 0 sfnum 88 external false splittable false
>    function:
>      hw_addr 00:00:00:00:00:00 state inactive opstate detached
>
> $ udevadm test-builtin net_id /sys/class/net/eth6
> Load module index
> Parsed configuration file /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
> Created link configuration context.
> Using default interface naming scheme 'v245'.
> ID_NET_NAMING_SCHEME=v245
> ID_NET_NAME_PATH=enp6s0f0npf0sf88
> ID_NET_NAME_SLOT=ens2f0npf0sf88
> Unload module index
> Unloaded link configuration context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vu Pham <vuhuong@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
> ---
>   include/net/devlink.h |  52 ++++++++++++++++++
>   net/core/devlink.c    | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 173 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
> index dc3bf8000082..d8edd9a10907 100644
> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,17 @@ struct devlink_port {
>   	struct mutex reporters_lock; /* Protects reporter_list */
>   };
>   
> +struct devlink_port_new_attrs {
> +	enum devlink_port_flavour flavour;
> +	unsigned int port_index;
> +	u32 controller;
> +	u32 sfnum;
> +	u16 pfnum;
> +	u8 port_index_valid:1,
> +	   controller_valid:1,
> +	   sfnum_valid:1;
> +};
> +
>   struct devlink_sb_pool_info {
>   	enum devlink_sb_pool_type pool_type;
>   	u32 size;
> @@ -1362,6 +1373,47 @@ struct devlink_ops {
>   	int (*port_function_hw_addr_set)(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_port *port,
>   					 const u8 *hw_addr, int hw_addr_len,
>   					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +	/**
> +	 * port_new() - Add a new port function of a specified flavor
> +	 * @devlink: Devlink instance
> +	 * @attrs: attributes of the new port
> +	 * @extack: extack for reporting error messages
> +	 * @new_port_index: index of the new port
> +	 *
> +	 * Devlink core will call this device driver function upon user request
> +	 * to create a new port function of a specified flavor and optional
> +	 * attributes
> +	 *
> +	 * Notes:
> +	 *	- Called without devlink instance lock being held. Drivers must
> +	 *	  implement own means of synchronization
> +	 *	- On success, drivers must register a port with devlink core
> +	 *
> +	 * Return: 0 on success, negative value otherwise.
> +	 */
> +	int (*port_new)(struct devlink *devlink,
> +			const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *attrs,
> +			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> +			unsigned int *new_port_index);
> +	/**
> +	 * port_del() - Delete a port function
> +	 * @devlink: Devlink instance
> +	 * @port_index: port function index to delete
> +	 * @extack: extack for reporting error messages
> +	 *
> +	 * Devlink core will call this device driver function upon user request
> +	 * to delete a previously created port function
> +	 *
> +	 * Notes:
> +	 *	- Called without devlink instance lock being held. Drivers must
> +	 *	  implement own means of synchronization
> +	 *	- On success, drivers must unregister the corresponding devlink
> +	 *	  port
> +	 *
> +	 * Return: 0 on success, negative value otherwise.
> +	 */
> +	int (*port_del)(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int port_index,
> +			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>   };
>   
>   static inline void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink)
> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
> index 4cbc02fb602d..541b5f549274 100644
> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> @@ -1147,6 +1147,111 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_unsplit_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>   	return devlink_port_unsplit(devlink, port_index, info->extack);
>   }
>   
> +static int devlink_port_new_notifiy(struct devlink *devlink,
> +				    unsigned int port_index,
> +				    struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
> +	struct sk_buff *msg;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!msg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> +	devlink_port = devlink_port_get_by_index(devlink, port_index);
> +	if (!devlink_port) {
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = devlink_nl_port_fill(msg, devlink, devlink_port,
> +				   DEVLINK_CMD_NEW, info->snd_portid,
> +				   info->snd_seq, 0, NULL);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	err = genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
> +	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
> +	return err;
> +
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
> +	nlmsg_free(msg);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +					struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
> +	struct devlink_port_new_attrs new_attrs = {};
> +	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> +	unsigned int new_port_index;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!devlink->ops->port_new || !devlink->ops->port_del)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (!info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR] ||
> +	    !info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port flavour or PCI PF are not specified");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	new_attrs.flavour = nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR]);
> +	new_attrs.pfnum =
> +		nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER]);
> +
> +	if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]) {
> +		/* Port index of the new port being created by driver. */
> +		new_attrs.port_index =
> +			nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]);
> +		new_attrs.port_index_valid = true;
> +	}
> +	if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER]) {
> +		new_attrs.controller =
> +			nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER]);
> +		new_attrs.controller_valid = true;
> +	}
> +	if (new_attrs.flavour == DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PCI_SF &&
> +	    info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER]) {
> +		new_attrs.sfnum = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER]);
> +		new_attrs.sfnum_valid = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = devlink->ops->port_new(devlink, &new_attrs, extack,
> +				     &new_port_index);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = devlink_port_new_notifiy(devlink, new_port_index, info);
> +	if (err && err != -ENODEV) {
> +		/* Fail to send the response; destroy newly created port. */
> +		devlink->ops->port_del(devlink, new_port_index, extack);
> +	}
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +					struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> +	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
> +	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> +	unsigned int port_index;
> +
> +	if (!devlink->ops->port_del)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (!info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port index is not specified");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	port_index = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]);
> +
> +	return devlink->ops->port_del(devlink, port_index, extack);
> +}
> +
>   static int devlink_nl_sb_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>   			      struct devlink_sb *devlink_sb,
>   			      enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
> @@ -7605,6 +7710,10 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>   	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION] = NLA_POLICY_RANGE(NLA_U8, DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT,
>   							DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX),
>   	[DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_LIMITS] = NLA_POLICY_BITFIELD32(DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMITS_VALID_MASK),
> +	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
> +	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
> +	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>   };
>   
>   static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
> @@ -7644,6 +7753,18 @@ static const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
>   		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
>   		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
>   	},
> +	{
> +		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW,
> +		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit,
> +		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> +		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL,
> +		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_port_del_doit,
> +		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
> +		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
> +	},
>   	{
>   		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_SB_GET,
>   		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ