[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210122105351.11751-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:53:49 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
kuba@...nel.org, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, maximmi@...dia.com,
davem@...emloft.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
ciara.loftus@...el.com, weqaar.a.janjua@...el.com,
andrii@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] xsk: remove explicit_free parameter from __xsk_rcv()
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
The explicit_free parameter of the __xsk_rcv() function was used to
mark whether the call was via the generic XDP or the native XDP
path. Instead of clutter the code with if-statements and "true/false"
parameters which are hard to understand, simply move the explicit free
to the __xsk_map_redirect() which is always called from the native XDP
path.
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
---
net/xdp/xsk.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
index 4a83117507f5..4faabd1ecfd1 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
@@ -184,12 +184,13 @@ static void xsk_copy_xdp(struct xdp_buff *to, struct xdp_buff *from, u32 len)
memcpy(to_buf, from_buf, len + metalen);
}
-static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len,
- bool explicit_free)
+static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
{
struct xdp_buff *xsk_xdp;
int err;
+ u32 len;
+ len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
if (len > xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size(xs->pool)) {
xs->rx_dropped++;
return -ENOSPC;
@@ -207,8 +208,6 @@ static int __xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 len,
xsk_buff_free(xsk_xdp);
return err;
}
- if (explicit_free)
- xdp_return_buff(xdp);
return 0;
}
@@ -230,11 +229,8 @@ static bool xsk_is_bound(struct xdp_sock *xs)
return false;
}
-static int xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
- bool explicit_free)
+static int xsk_rcv_check(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
{
- u32 len;
-
if (!xsk_is_bound(xs))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -242,11 +238,7 @@ static int xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
return -EINVAL;
sk_mark_napi_id_once_xdp(&xs->sk, xdp);
- len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
-
- return xdp->rxq->mem.type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL ?
- __xsk_rcv_zc(xs, xdp, len) :
- __xsk_rcv(xs, xdp, len, explicit_free);
+ return 0;
}
static void xsk_flush(struct xdp_sock *xs)
@@ -261,18 +253,41 @@ int xsk_generic_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
int err;
spin_lock_bh(&xs->rx_lock);
- err = xsk_rcv(xs, xdp, false);
- xsk_flush(xs);
+ err = xsk_rcv_check(xs, xdp);
+ if (!err) {
+ err = __xsk_rcv(xs, xdp);
+ xsk_flush(xs);
+ }
spin_unlock_bh(&xs->rx_lock);
return err;
}
+static int xsk_rcv(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
+{
+ int err;
+ u32 len;
+
+ err = xsk_rcv_check(xs, xdp);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (xdp->rxq->mem.type == MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL) {
+ len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
+ return __xsk_rcv_zc(xs, xdp, len);
+ }
+
+ err = __xsk_rcv(xs, xdp);
+ if (!err)
+ xdp_return_buff(xdp);
+ return err;
+}
+
int __xsk_map_redirect(struct xdp_sock *xs, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
{
struct list_head *flush_list = this_cpu_ptr(&xskmap_flush_list);
int err;
- err = xsk_rcv(xs, xdp, true);
+ err = xsk_rcv(xs, xdp);
if (err)
return err;
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists