netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/4] net: mvpp2: Remove unneeded Kconfig dependency.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:12:27 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@...com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/4] net: mvpp2: Remove unneeded Kconfig dependency.

On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 05:26:26 -0800 Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 06:14:44PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> > (I would put it in net-next tho, given the above this at most a space
> > optimization.)  
> 
> It isn't just about space but also time.  The reason why I targeted
> net and not net-next was that NETWORK_PHY_TIMESTAMPING activates a
> function call to skb_clone_tx_timestamp() for every transmitted frame.
> 
> 	static inline void skb_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb)
> 	{
> 		skb_clone_tx_timestamp(skb);
> 		if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP)
> 			skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL);
> 	}
> 
> In the abscence of a PHY time stamping device, the check for its
> presence inside of skb_clone_tx_timestamp() will of course fail, but
> this still incurs the cost of the call on every transmitted skb.
> 
> Similarly netif_receive_skb() futilely calls skb_defer_rx_timestamp()
> on every received skb.
> 
> I would argue that most users don't want this option activated by
> accident.

I see. The only thing I'm worried about then is the churn in patch 3.
This would land in Linus's tree shortly before rc6, kinda late to be
taking chances in the name of minor optimizations :S
 
> (And yes, we could avoid the functions call by moving the check
> outside of the global functions and inline to the call sites.  I'll be
> sure to have that in the shiny new improved scheme under discussion.)