[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB51051BEF0A7237F13BB58575FABF9@CO1PR11MB5105.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 01:13:25 +0000
From: "Brelinski, TonyX" <tonyx.brelinski@...el.com>
To: "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"Topel, Bjorn" <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 05/11] ice: move skb pointer
from rx_buf to rx_ring
From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf Of Maciej Fijalkowski
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:13 AM
To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; kuba@...nel.org; bpf@...r.kernel.org; Topel, Bjorn <bjorn.topel@...el.com>; Karlsson, Magnus <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 05/11] ice: move skb pointer from rx_buf to rx_ring
Similar thing has been done in i40e, as there is no real need for having the sk_buff pointer in each rx_buf. Non-eop frames can be simply handled on that pointer moved upwards to rx_ring.
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 30 ++++++++++------------- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tonyx.brelinski@...el.com> A Contingent Worker at Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists