[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4f19b649-a837-48af-90d1-c4692580053d@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 02:27:53 -0800
From: "Christopher William Snowhill" <chris@...e54.net>
To: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com,
daniel@...earbox.net, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: allow empty module BTFs
When is this being applied to an actual kernel? 5.11 is still quite broken without these two patches. Unless you're not using a vfat EFI partition, I guess.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021, at 12:20 PM, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
> Hello:
>
> This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (refs/heads/master):
>
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 23:03:40 -0800 you wrote:
> > Some modules don't declare any new types and end up with an empty BTF,
> > containing only valid BTF header and no types or strings sections. This
> > currently causes BTF validation error. There is nothing wrong with such BTF,
> > so fix the issue by allowing module BTFs with no types or strings.
> >
> > Reported-by: Christopher William Snowhill <chris@...e54.net>
> > Fixes: 36e68442d1af ("bpf: Load and verify kernel module BTFs")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
> >
> > [...]
>
> Here is the summary with links:
> - [bpf,1/2] bpf: allow empty module BTFs
> https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/bcc5e6162d66
> - [bpf,2/2] libbpf: allow loading empty BTFs
> https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/b8d52264df85
>
> You are awesome, thank you!
> --
> Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
> https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists