[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210126000228.gpyh3rrp662wysit@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:02:29 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com" <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Po Liu <po.liu@....com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/8] igc: Avoid TX Hangs because long cycles
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:44:50PM -0800, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Avoid possible TX Hangs caused by using long Qbv cycles. In some
> cases, using long cycles (more than 1 second) can cause transmissions
> to be blocked for that time. As the TX Hang timeout is close to 1
> second, we may need to reduce the cycle time to something more
> reasonable: the value chosen is 1ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> ---
Don't you want this patch to go to 'net' and be backported?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists