netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: allow rewriting to ports under ip_unprivileged_port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210126204445.hkoi2e7zvlgowtn3@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:44:45 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: allow rewriting to ports under
 ip_unprivileged_port_start

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:35:43AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> At the moment, BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_BIND hooks can rewrite user_port
> to the privileged ones (< ip_unprivileged_port_start), but it will
> be rejected later on in the __inet_bind or __inet6_bind.
> 
> Let's add another return value to indicate that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
> check should be ignored. Use the same idea as we currently use
> in cgroup/egress where bit #1 indicates CN. Instead, for
> cgroup/bind{4,6}, bit #1 indicates that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE should
> be bypassed.
> 
> v4:
> - Add missing IPv6 support (Martin KaFai Lau)
> 
> v3:
> - Update description (Martin KaFai Lau)
> - Fix capability restore in selftest (Martin KaFai Lau)
> 
> v2:
> - Switch to explicit return code (Martin KaFai Lau)
Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>