[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACycT3vFafH=-KrVu6_ypCR1bnyVwziOmFO552JSkq4fk+6yHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:51:51 +0800
From: Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, sgarzare@...hat.com,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
axboe@...nel.dk, bcrl@...ck.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC v3 10/11] vduse: grab the module's references until
there is no vduse device
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:10 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/1/19 下午1:07, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > The module should not be unloaded if any vduse device exists.
> > So increase the module's reference count when creating vduse
> > device. And the reference count is kept until the device is
> > destroyed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
>
>
> Looks like a bug fix. If yes, let's squash this into patch 8.
>
Will do it.
Thanks,
Yongji
Powered by blists - more mailing lists