lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:05:14 +0800
From:   Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        axboe@...nel.dk, bcrl@...ck.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC v3 03/11] vdpa: Remove the restriction that only
 supports virtio-net devices

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 4:59 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:59:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> >With VDUSE, we should be able to support all kinds of virtio devices.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
> >---
> > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 29 +++--------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> >index 29ed4173f04e..448be7875b6d 100644
> >--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> >+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> >@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include <linux/nospec.h>
> > #include <linux/vhost.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio_net.h>
> >+#include <linux/virtio_blk.h>
>
> Is this inclusion necessary?
>

My mistake...

> Maybe we can remove virtio_net.h as well.
>

Agree.

Thanks,
Yongji

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ