[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a13adce-ed2b-5365-c269-a643e2c49d3c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:43:38 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: automatically bring user ports
down when master goes down
On 1/27/2021 4:52 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:50:14AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:46:30AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> + case NETDEV_GOING_DOWN: {
>>>> + struct dsa_port *dp, *cpu_dp;
>>>> + struct dsa_switch_tree *dst;
>>>> + int err = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!netdev_uses_dsa(dev))
>>>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>> +
>>>> + cpu_dp = dev->dsa_ptr;
>>>> + dst = cpu_dp->ds->dst;
>>>> +
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
>>>> + if (!dsa_is_user_port(dp->ds, dp->index)) {
>>>
>>> !dsa_is_user_port() ??
>>>
>>> That ! seems odd.
>>
>> Oops, that's something that I refactored at the last minute after I
>> prototyped the idea from:
>> if (!dsa_is_user_port(dp->ds, dp->index))
>> continue;
>> because it looked uglier that way.
>
> I was guessing it would be something like that. With that fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
When you fix it:
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists