lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2836dccc-faa9-3bb6-c4d5-dd60c75b275a@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:51:23 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1] net: adjust net_device layout for cacheline
 usage

On 1/26/21 10:39 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> The current layout of net_device is not optimal for cacheline usage.
> 
> The member adj_list.lower linked list is split between cacheline 2 and 3.
> The ifindex is placed together with stats (struct net_device_stats),
> although most modern drivers don't update this stats member.
> 
> The members netdev_ops, mtu and hard_header_len are placed on three
> different cachelines. These members are accessed for XDP redirect into
> devmap, which were noticeably with perf tool. When not using the map
> redirect variant (like TC-BPF does), then ifindex is also used, which is
> placed on a separate fourth cacheline. These members are also accessed
> during forwarding with regular network stack. The members priv_flags and
> flags are on fast-path for network stack transmit path in __dev_queue_xmit
> (currently located together with mtu cacheline).
> 
> This patch creates a read mostly cacheline, with the purpose of keeping the
> above mentioned members on the same cacheline.
> 
> Some netdev_features_t members also becomes part of this cacheline, which is
> on purpose, as function netif_skb_features() is on fast-path via
> validate_xmit_skb().

A long over due look at the organization of this struct. Do you have
performance numbers for the XDP case?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ