[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128161130.73cf3847@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:11:30 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, edwin.peer@...adcom.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
dsahern@...nel.org, kiran.patil@...el.com,
david.m.ertman@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next V10 00/14] Add mlx5 subfunction support
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:03:02 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 17:34 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:36:44 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > This series form Parav was the theme of this mlx5 release cycle,
> > > we've been waiting anxiously for the auxbus infrastructure to make
> > > it into
> > > the kernel, and now as the auxbus is in and all the stars are
> > > aligned, I
> > > can finally submit this patchset of the devlink and mlx5
> > > subfunction support.
> > >
> > > For more detailed information about subfunctions please see
> > > detailed tag
> > > log below.
> >
> > Are there any further comments, objections or actions that need to be
> > taken on this series, anyone?
> >
> > Looks like the discussion has ended. Not knowing any users who would
> > need this I'd like to at least make sure we have reasonable consensus
> > among vendors.
>
> Hey Jakub, sorry to nag, but I need to make some progress, can we move
> on please ? my submission queue is about to explode :) !
I'll pull it in by the end of the day, just need to do some backports
and then it'll be on top of my list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists