[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128190405.27d6f086@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:04:05 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...il.com,
amcohen@...dia.com, roopa@...dia.com, sharpd@...dia.com,
bpoirier@...dia.com, mlxsw@...dia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: ipv4: Emit notification when fib
hardware flags are changed
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:23:06 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Emit RTM_NEWROUTE notifications whenever RTM_F_OFFLOAD/RTM_F_TRAP flags
> are changed. The aim is to provide an indication to user-space
> (e.g., routing daemons) about the state of the route in hardware.
What does the daemon in the user space do with it?
The notification will only be generated for the _first_ ASIC which
offloaded the object. Which may be fine for you today but as an uAPI
it feels slightly lacking.
If the user space just wants to make sure the devices are synced to
notifications from certain stage, wouldn't it be more idiomatic to
provide some "fence" operation?
WDYT? David?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists