[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210130134334.10243-1-dqfext@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 21:43:34 +0800
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: override existent unicast portvec in port_fdb_add
Having multiple destination ports for a unicast address does not make
sense.
Make port_db_load_purge override existent unicast portvec instead of
adding a new port bit.
Fixes: 884729399260 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: handle multiple ports in ATU")
Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index b99f27b8c084..ae0b490f00cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -1686,7 +1686,11 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_db_load_purge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
if (!entry.portvec)
entry.state = 0;
} else {
- entry.portvec |= BIT(port);
+ if (state == MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_DATA_STATE_UC_STATIC)
+ entry.portvec = BIT(port);
+ else
+ entry.portvec |= BIT(port);
+
entry.state = state;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists