[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBVIMvTN8ZFC+54U@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 12:51:14 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Aviraj Cj (acj)" <acj@...co.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuznet@....inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Internal review][PATCH stable v5.4 1/2] ICMPv6: Add ICMPv6
Parameter Problem, code 3 definition
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:31:11AM +0000, Aviraj Cj (acj) wrote:
>
>
> On 30/01/21, 2:06 PM, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:57:40AM +0530, Aviraj CJ wrote:
> > From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> >
> > commit b59e286be280fa3c2e94a0716ddcee6ba02bc8ba upstream.
> >
> > Based on RFC7112, Section 6:
> >
> > IANA has added the following "Type 4 - Parameter Problem" message to
> > the "Internet Control Message Protocol version 6 (ICMPv6) Parameters"
> > registry:
> >
> > CODE NAME/DESCRIPTION
> > 3 IPv6 First Fragment has incomplete IPv6 Header Chain
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Aviraj CJ <acj@...co.com>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h b/include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h
> > index 2622b5a3e616..9a31ea2ad1cf 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/icmpv6.h
> > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct icmp6hdr {
> > #define ICMPV6_HDR_FIELD 0
> > #define ICMPV6_UNK_NEXTHDR 1
> > #define ICMPV6_UNK_OPTION 2
> > +#define ICMPV6_HDR_INCOMP 3
> >
> > /*
> > * constants for (set|get)sockopt
> > --
> > 2.26.2.Cisco
> >
>
> What do you mean by "internal review" and what am I supposed to do with
> this patch? Same for the 2/2 patch in this series...
> <ACJ> Sorry " internal review" added by mistake, this is the correct patch for v5.4 branch, pls let me if u want me to send it by correcting...
Please fix and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists