[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGngYiVw2mwmcFWJNid52oPPET2M6+BEgr+Eb-_-yUj6it0ifw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:59:50 -0500
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To: Bryan Whitehead <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
Cc: Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Alexey Denisov <rtgbnm@...il.com>,
Sergej Bauer <sbauer@...ckbox.su>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Anders Rønningen <anders@...ningen.priv.no>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/6] lan743x: boost performance on cpu archs
w/o dma cache snooping
Hi Bryan, thank you so much for reviewing, I really appreciate it.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 5:11 PM <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> > /* unmap from dma */
> > + packet_length = RX_DESC_DATA0_FRAME_LENGTH_GET_
> > + (descriptor->data0);
> It appears you moved this packet_length assignment from just below the following if block, however you left out the le32_to_cpu.See next comment
>
Correct on both counts. This is a merge snafu that crept in when I
rebased to Alexey's very recent little/big endian patch, at the last
minute.
My tests didn't catch it, because I'm running on a little-endian cpu,
where le32_to_cpu() compiles to a nop.
Had I had the good sense to run sparse on every patch, like Jakub has,
I would have caught it...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists