netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: hellcreek: Report tables sizes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210131212826.dcr2cur4cf2xlhje@skbuf>
Date:   Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:28:26 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...-computers.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: hellcreek: Report tables sizes

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Florian, Andrew and Vladimir suggested at some point to use devlink for
> reporting tables, features and debugging counters instead of using debugfs and
> printk.
> 
> So, start by reporting the VLAN and FDB table sizes.

I don't remember having suggested that, but nonetheless it doesn't seem
like a bad idea.

By the way, your email landed in my spam folder, I just noticed the
patches by accident on patchwork.

Sorry, I am not competent enough in email headers to tell you the reason
why gmail flagged you.

	Why is this message in spam?
	It is in violation of Google's recommended email sender guidelines.