netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: hellcreek: Report tables sizes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:56:09 +0100
From:   Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...-computers.de>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: dsa: hellcreek: Report tables sizes

On Sun Jan 31 2021, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 02:59:32PM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> Florian, Andrew and Vladimir suggested at some point to use devlink for
>> reporting tables, features and debugging counters instead of using debugfs and
>> printk.
>> 
>> So, start by reporting the VLAN and FDB table sizes.
>
> I don't remember having suggested that, but nonetheless it doesn't seem
> like a bad idea.

If I remember correctly, you also mentioned to use devlink to dump the
databases via regions.

>
> By the way, your email landed in my spam folder, I just noticed the
> patches by accident on patchwork.
>
> Sorry, I am not competent enough in email headers to tell you the reason
> why gmail flagged you.
>
> 	Why is this message in spam?
> 	It is in violation of Google's recommended email sender guidelines.
>

Thanks. I'll look into my setup.

Thanks,
Kurt

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (866 bytes)