[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1aa6778a-6aff-e72f-ca98-74ce952c1e56@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:38:18 -0600
From: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, elder@...nel.org,
evgreen@...omium.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
cpratapa@...eaurora.org,
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: ipa: don't disable NAPI in suspend
On 2/1/21 8:47 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> - I will begin some long testing later today without
>> this last patch applied
>> --> But I think testing without the IRQ ordering
>> patch would be more promising, and I'd like
>> to hear your opinion on that
> Either test depends on whether you find it worthwhile to more
> specifically identify the root cause. If not, no need to run the tests
> on my behalf. I understand that these are time consuming.
I *would* like to really understand the root cause.
And a month ago I would have absolutely gone through
a bisect process so I could narrow it down.
But at this point I'm content to have it fixed (fingers
crossed) and am more interested in putting all this
behind me. It's taken a lot of time and attention.
And even though this represents a real bug, at least
for now I am content to keep all this work in net-next
rather than isolate the specific problem and try to
back-port it (without all the other 20+ commits that
preceded these) to the net branch.
So although I see the value in identifying the specific
root cause, I'm not going to do that unless/until it
becomes clear it *must* be done (to back-port to net).
-Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists