[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69e92a09-d597-2385-2391-fee100464c59@bluematt.me>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:21:46 -0500
From: Matt Corallo <linux-wired-list@...ematt.me>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-wired-list@...ematt.me" <linux-wired-list@...ematt.me>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"nick.lowe@...il.com" <nick.lowe@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] igb: Enable RSS for Intel I211 Ethernet Controller
On 2/1/21 2:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Matt, would you mind clarifying if this is indeed a regression for i211?
>
Admittedly, I didn't go all the way back to test that it is, indeed, a regression. The Fixes commit that it was tagged
with on Tony's tree was something more recent than initial igb landing (its a refactor of RSS) and there are numerous
posts online indicating common I211 hardware (eg PCEngines APU2) support RSS and properly load multiple cores, so I
naively assumed that it is a regression of some form.
Did you test kernels odler than c883de9fd787, Nick?
Given that, and the non-invasive nature of the patch, I figured it was worth trying to land on LTS trees and going ahead
with it for 5.11, but I don't feel strongly on how it ends up on LTS, it just seems a waste to not land it there.
Matt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists