[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY5PR12MB4322E41AB919F5F5AF4AF40CDCB69@BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:50:33 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iproute2-next 5/5] devlink: Support set of port function
state
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 11:01 PM
>
> On 1/29/21 9:56 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > @@ -1420,6 +1423,22 @@ static int port_flavour_parse(const char
> *flavour, uint16_t *value)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static int port_function_state_parse(const char *statestr, uint8_t
> > +*state) {
> > + if (!statestr)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (strcmp(statestr, "inactive") == 0) {
> > + *state = DEVLINK_PORT_FN_STATE_INACTIVE;
> > + return 0;
> > + } else if (strcmp(statestr, "active") == 0) {
> > + *state = DEVLINK_PORT_FN_STATE_ACTIVE;
> > + return 0;
> > + } else {
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
>
> if another state gets added this too should be table driven - string to type
> here and the inverse in the previous patch.
>
Yes. Will reuse the helper that I am introducing for port flavour in v2.
> > struct dl_args_metadata {
> > uint64_t o_flag;
> > char err_msg[DL_ARGS_REQUIRED_MAX_ERR_LEN];
>
>
>
> > @@ -3897,7 +3934,6 @@ static void pr_out_port_function(struct dl *dl,
> > struct nlattr **tb_port)
> >
> > print_string(PRINT_ANY, "opstate", " opstate %s",
> port_function_opstate(state));
> > }
> > -
> > if (!dl->json_output)
> > __pr_out_indent_dec();
> > pr_out_object_end(dl);
>
> Removing the newline intentional?
>
Oops. Will add back.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists