[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMjLKoQe_OB_L+w2wwUGck74Gm6=GPA=CK73QpeFbXr7Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:00:51 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>, smalin@...vell.com,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, yorayz@...dia.com,
boris.pismenny@...il.com, Ben Ben-Ishay <benishay@...lanox.com>,
Yoray Zack <yorayz@...lanox.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
axboe@...com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, benishay@...dia.com,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 01/21] iov_iter: Introduce new procedures for
copy to iter/pages
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:38 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 12:04:49PM +0200, Boris Pismenny wrote:
> > +static __always_inline __must_check
> > +size_t ddp_copy_to_iter(const void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
> > +{
> > + if (unlikely(!check_copy_size(addr, bytes, true)))
> > + return 0;
> > + else
> > + return _ddp_copy_to_iter(addr, bytes, i);
> > +}
>
> No need for the else after a return, and the normal kernel convention
> double underscores for magic internal functions.
ack for the no-else-after-a-return
Re the double underscoring, I was not sure, e.g the non-ddp counterpart
(_copy_to_iter) is single underscored
> But more importantly: does this belong into the generic header without
> and comments what the ddp means and when it should be used?
will look into this, any idea for a more suitable location?
> > +static void ddp_memcpy_to_page(struct page *page, size_t offset, const char *from, size_t len)
>
> Overly long line. But we're also looking into generic helpers for
> this kind of things, not sure if they made it to linux-next in the
> meantime, but please check.
This is what I found in linux-next - note sure if you were referring to it
commit 11432a3cc061c39475295be533c3674c4f8a6d0b
Author: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
iov_iter: Add ITER_XARRAY
> > +size_t _ddp_copy_to_iter(const void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
> > +{
> > + const char *from = addr;
> > + if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_pipe(i)))
> > + return copy_pipe_to_iter(addr, bytes, i);
> > + if (iter_is_iovec(i))
> > + might_fault();
> > + iterate_and_advance(i, bytes, v,
> > + copyout(v.iov_base, (from += v.iov_len) - v.iov_len, v.iov_len),
> > + ddp_memcpy_to_page(v.bv_page, v.bv_offset,
> > + (from += v.bv_len) - v.bv_len, v.bv_len),
> > + memcpy(v.iov_base, (from += v.iov_len) - v.iov_len, v.iov_len)
> > + )
> > +
> > + return bytes;
> > +}
>
> This bloats every kernel build, so please move it into a conditionally built file.
ack
> And please document the whole thing.
ok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists