[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 02:40:06 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
drt@...ux.ibm.com, sukadev@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
julietk@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over
reset
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:34:01 -0600 you wrote:
> Returning -EBUSY in ibmvnic_remove() does not actually hold the
> removal procedure since driver core doesn't care for the return
> value (see __device_release_driver() in drivers/base/dd.c
> calling dev->bus->remove()) though vio_bus_remove
> (in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c) records the
> return value and passes it on. [1]
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over reset
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/5e9eff5dfa46
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists