[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dJJjiQK+N0U04eWCU50DRbFLNqHSi7Apj==d3ygzkz6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:52:37 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/2] net: enable udp v6 sockets receiving v4
packets with UDP GRO
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:00 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > I saw the state of this patchset is still new, should I repost it?
>
> It needs a fix in patch 2 (see my response to that patch).
>
Sorry, my mistake, I forgot to enable rxrpc when building kernel.
Will repost, Thank you.
BTW, I'm also thinking to use udp_sock_create(), the only problem I can
see is it may not do bind() in rxrpc_open_socket(), is that true? or we
can actually bind to some address when a local address is not supplied?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists