[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <707366.1612345842@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:50:42 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
pabeni@...hat.com, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 2/2] rxrpc: call udp_tunnel_encap_enable in rxrpc_open_socket
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> When doing encap_enable/increasing encap_needed_key, up->encap_enabled
> is not set in rxrpc_open_socket(), and it will cause encap_needed_key
> not being decreased in udpv6_destroy_sock().
>
> This patch is to improve it by just calling udp_tunnel_encap_enable()
> where it increases both UDP and UDPv6 encap_needed_key and sets
> up->encap_enabled.
>
> v4->v5:
> - add the missing '#include <net/udp_tunnel.h>', as David Howells
> noticed.
>
> Acked-and-tested-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Looks good.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists