netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGngYiVK5=vggym5LiqvjiRVTSWscc=CgX6UPOBkZpknuLC62Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:53:21 -0500
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Bryan Whitehead <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Alexey Denisov <rtgbnm@...il.com>,
        Sergej Bauer <sbauer@...ckbox.su>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        Anders Rønningen <anders@...ningen.priv.no>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets

Thank you Bryan. I will prepare a v2 early next week.

Would Microchip be able to donate some time to test v2? My own tests
are certainly not perfect. Various stress tests across architectures
(intel/arm) would help create confidence in the multi-buffer frame
implementation. Perhaps Microchip has various test rigs already set
up?

After all, absence of bugs is more important than speed improvements.