netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: mhi: Add RX/TX fixup callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:08:43 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
Cc:     bjorn@...k.no, dcbw@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        carl.yin@...ctel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: mhi: Add RX/TX fixup callbacks

Please put the maintainers or the list thru which you expect the patch
to be applied in the To: field of your emails.

On Mon,  1 Feb 2021 22:05:40 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> +	if (proto && proto->tx_fixup) {
> +		skb = proto->tx_fixup(mhi_netdev, skb);
> +		if (unlikely(!skb))
> +			goto exit_drop;
> +	}

> @@ -170,7 +193,11 @@ static void mhi_net_dl_callback(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev,
>  		}
>  
>  		skb_put(skb, mhi_res->bytes_xferd);
> -		netif_rx(skb);
> +
> +		if (proto && proto->rx_fixup)
> +			proto->rx_fixup(mhi_netdev, skb);
> +		else
> +			netif_rx(skb);
>  	}

There us a slight asymmetry between tx_fixup and rx_fixup.
tx_fixup just massages the frame and then mhi_net still takes
care of transmission. On Rx side rx_fixup actually does the
netif_rx(skb). Maybe s/rx_fixup/rx/ ?