[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210204120922.GA9417@ranger.igk.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:09:22 +0100
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, ast@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv17 bpf-next 0/6] xdp: add a new helper for dev map
multicast support
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:53:20PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> >> Hangbin Liu wrote:
> >> > Hi Daniel, Alexei,
> >> >
> >> > It has been one week after Maciej, Toke, John's review/ack. What should
> >> > I do to make a progress for this patch set?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Patchwork is usually the first place to check:
> >
> > Thanks John for the link.
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=421095&state=*
> >
> > Before I sent the email I only checked link
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/ but can't find my patch.
> >
> > How do you get the series number?
>
> If you click the "show patches with" link at the top you can twiddle the
> filtering; state = any + your own name as submitter usually finds
> things, I've found.
>
> >> Looks like it was marked changed requested. After this its unlikely
> >> anyone will follow up on it, rightly so given the assumption another
> >> revision is coming.
> >>
> >> In this case my guess is it was moved into changes requested because
> >> I asked for a change, but then after some discussion you convinced me
> >> the change was not in fact needed.
> >>
> >> Alexei, Daniel can probably tell you if its easier to just send a v18
> >> or pull in the v17 assuming any final reviews don't kick anything
> >> else up.
> >
> > OK, I will wait for Alexei, Daniel and see if I need to do a rebase.
>
> I think I would just resubmit with a rebase + a note in the changelog
> that we concluded no further change was needed :)
I only asked for imperative mood in commit messages, but not sure if
anyone cares ;)
>
> -Toke
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists