netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Return the correct errno code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210204111426.00001bba@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:14:26 -0800
From:   Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:     Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Return the correct errno code

Zheng Yongjun wrote:

> When kzalloc failed, should return ENOMEM rather than ENOBUFS.

All these patches have the same subject and description, couldn't they
just be part of a single series with a good cover letter?

I'm not saying make them a single patch, because that is bad for
bisection, but having them as a single series means we review related
changes at one time, and can comment on them as a group.