[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210204004259.3662059-11-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:42:54 -0800
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sassmann@...hat.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
Gal Hammer <ghammer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/15] igc: Fix TDBAL register show incorrect value
From: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
Fixed a typo which caused the registers dump function to read the
RDBAL register when printing TDBAL register values.
_reg_dump method has been partially derived from i210 and have
same typo.
Suggested-by: Gal Hammer <ghammer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_dump.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_dump.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_dump.c
index 4b9ec7d0b727..495bed47ed0a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_dump.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_dump.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static void igc_regdump(struct igc_hw *hw, struct igc_reg_info *reginfo)
break;
case IGC_TDBAL(0):
for (n = 0; n < 4; n++)
- regs[n] = rd32(IGC_RDBAL(n));
+ regs[n] = rd32(IGC_TDBAL(n));
break;
case IGC_TDBAH(0):
for (n = 0; n < 4; n++)
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists