[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-+1TP7NxNVsN7OS9339FBOwGRifH=+L6KFCR=MCcwR5=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:42:03 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Andreas Roeseler <andreas.a.roeseler@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 1/5] icmp: add support for RFC 8335 PROBE
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:25 PM Andreas Roeseler
<andreas.a.roeseler@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Add definitions for PROBE ICMP types and codes.
>
> Add AFI definitions for IP and IPV6 as specified by IANA
>
> Add a struct to represent the additional header when probing by IP
> address (ctype == 3) for use in parsing incoming PROBE messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Roeseler <andreas.a.roeseler@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Add AFI_IP and AFI_IP6 definitions
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/icmp.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h
> index fb169a50895e..e70bfcc06247 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/icmp.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,23 @@
> #define ICMP_EXC_TTL 0 /* TTL count exceeded */
> #define ICMP_EXC_FRAGTIME 1 /* Fragment Reass time exceeded */
>
> +/* Codes for EXT_ECHO (PROBE) */
> +#define ICMP_EXT_ECHO 42
> +#define ICMP_EXT_ECHOREPLY 43
> +#define ICMP_EXT_MAL_QUERY 1 /* Malformed Query */
> +#define ICMP_EXT_NO_IF 2 /* No such Interface */
> +#define ICMP_EXT_NO_TABLE_ENT 3 /* No such Table Entry */
> +#define ICMP_EXT_MULT_IFS 4 /* Multiple Interfaces Satisfy Query */
> +
> +/* constants for EXT_ECHO (PROBE) */
> +#define EXT_ECHOREPLY_ACTIVE (1 << 2)/* position of active flag in reply */
> +#define EXT_ECHOREPLY_IPV4 (1 << 1)/* position of ipv4 flag in reply */
> +#define EXT_ECHOREPLY_IPV6 1 /* position of ipv6 flag in reply */
> +#define CTYPE_NAME 1
> +#define CTYPE_INDEX 2
> +#define CTYPE_ADDR 3
Please use a prefix. These definitions are too generic and may clash
with others. Same for the two below. Does all this need to be defined
UAPI?
> +#define AFI_IP 1 /* Address Family Identifier for IPV4 */
> +#define AFI_IP6 2 /* Address Family Identifier for IPV6 */
>
> struct icmphdr {
> __u8 type;
> @@ -118,4 +135,11 @@ struct icmp_extobj_hdr {
> __u8 class_type;
> };
>
> +/* RFC 8335: 2.1 Header for C-type 3 payload */
> +struct icmp_ext_ctype3_hdr {
> + __u16 afi;
> + __u8 addrlen;
> + __u8 reserved;
> +};
> +
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_ICMP_H */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists