[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2065089.1612484391@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:19:51 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
vfedorenko@...ek.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/2] net: enable udp v6 sockets receiving v4 packets with UDP GRO
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
> > If you could arrange for a random port to be assigned in such a case (and
> > indicated back to the caller), that would be awesome. Possibly I just don't
> > need to actually use bind in this case.
> >
> The patch is attached (based on this patch):
Initial testing seems to show that it works. I'll poke at it some more
tomorrow.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists