netdev - Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Introduce a devicetree quirk to skip host cap QMI requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:48:20 -0600
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, dt <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ath10k <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        David S Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Introduce a devicetree quirk to skip host cap
 QMI requests

On Mon 08 Feb 11:21 CST 2021, Kalle Valo wrote:

> Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi Kalle,
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 22:25, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is firmware version specific, right? There's also enum
> >> ath10k_fw_features which is embedded within firmware-N.bin, we could add
> >> a new flag there. But that means that a correct firmware-N.bin is needed
> >> for each firmware version, not sure if that would work out. Just
> >> throwing out ideas here.
> >
> > Apologies for this late reply. I was out for a while.
> 
> No worries.
> 
> > If by that (the firmware version) you mean "QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING",
> > then that may be a bit tricky. Pocophone F1 use the same firmware
> > family version (WLAN.HL.2.0.XXX), used by Dragonboard 845c (which has
> > Wi-Fi working upstream).
> 
> I'm meaning the ath10k firmware meta data we have in firmware-N.bin
> (N=2,3,4...) file. A quick summary:
> 
> Every ath10k firmware release should have firmware-N.bin. The file is
> created with this tool:
> 
> https://github.com/qca/qca-swiss-army-knife/blob/master/tools/scripts/ath10k/ath10k-fwencoder
> 
> firmware-N.bin contains various metadata, one of those being firmware
> feature flags:
> 
> enum ath10k_fw_features {
> 	/* wmi_mgmt_rx_hdr contains extra RSSI information */
> 	ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_EXT_WMI_MGMT_RX = 0,
> 
> 	/* Firmware from 10X branch. Deprecated, don't use in new code. */
> 	ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X = 1,
> 
>         [...]
> 
> So what you could is add a new flag enum ath10k_fw_features, create a
> new firmware-N.bin for your device and enable the flag on the firmware
> releases for your device only.
> 
> I don't know if this is usable, but one solution which came to my mind.

It sounds quite reasonable to pass this using firmawre-N.bin instead of
DT, however that would imply that we need to find firmware-N.bin in the
device-specific directory, where we keep the wlanmdsp.mbn as well - and
not under /lib/firmware/ath10k


For other devices (e.g. ADSP, modem or wlanmdsp.mbn) we're putting these
in e.g. /lib/firmware/qcom/LENOVO/81JL/ and specifies the location using
a firmware-name property in DT.

Regards,
Bjorn

> 
> -- 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
> 
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches