netdev - Re: [pull request][net-next V2 00/17] mlx5 updates 2021-02-04

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMi3SMP2vqjWYuX8RFJeXSrr9gPdxYF4UqiNtmCt=QL2NA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:43:42 +0200
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [pull request][net-next V2 00/17] mlx5 updates 2021-02-04

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:42 AM Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:10 AM Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Vlad Buslov says:
>
> > Implement support for VF tunneling
>
> > Currently, mlx5 only supports configuration with tunnel endpoint IP address on
> > uplink representor. Remove implicit and explicit assumptions of tunnel always
> > being terminated on uplink and implement necessary infrastructure for
> > configuring tunnels on VF representors and updating rules on such tunnels
> > according to routing changes.
>
> > SW TC model
>
> maybe before SW TC model, you can explain the vswitch SW model (TC is
> a vehicle to implement the SW model).

I thought my earlier post missed the list, so I reposted, but realized
now it didn't,
feel free to address either of the posts