[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCLdJPPC+6QjUsR4@krava>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:06:12 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: FAILED unresolved symbol vfs_truncate on arm64 with LLVM
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:13:42PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:09:36PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > > > > DW_AT_prototyped (true)
> > > > > > DW_AT_type (0x01cfdfe4 "long int")
> > > > > > DW_AT_external (true)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, the problem appears to be not in DWARF, but in mcount_loc data.
> > > > > vfs_truncate's address is not recorded as ftrace-attachable, and thus
> > > > > pahole ignores it. I don't know why this happens and it's quite
> > > > > strange, given vfs_truncate is just a normal global function.
> > >
> > > right, I can't see it in mcount adresses.. but it begins with instructions
> > > that appears to be nops, which would suggest it's traceable
> > >
> > > ffff80001031f430 <vfs_truncate>:
> > > ffff80001031f430: 5f 24 03 d5 hint #34
> > > ffff80001031f434: 1f 20 03 d5 nop
> > > ffff80001031f438: 1f 20 03 d5 nop
> > > ffff80001031f43c: 3f 23 03 d5 hint #25
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to understand this issue before we try to fix it, but there
> > > > > is at least one improvement we can make: pahole should check ftrace
> > > > > addresses only for static functions, not the global ones (global ones
> > > > > should be always attachable, unless they are special, e.g., notrace
> > > > > and stuff). We can easily check that by looking at the corresponding
> > > > > symbol. But I'd like to verify that vfs_truncate is ftrace-attachable
> >
> > I'm still trying to build the kernel.. however ;-)
>
> I finally reproduced.. however arm's not using mcount_loc
> but some other special section.. so it's new mess for me
so ftrace data actualy has vfs_truncate address but with extra 4 bytes:
ffff80001031f434
real vfs_truncate address:
ffff80001031f430 g F .text 0000000000000168 vfs_truncate
vfs_truncate disasm:
ffff80001031f430 <vfs_truncate>:
ffff80001031f430: 5f 24 03 d5 hint #34
ffff80001031f434: 1f 20 03 d5 nop
ffff80001031f438: 1f 20 03 d5 nop
ffff80001031f43c: 3f 23 03 d5 hint #25
thats why we don't match it in pahole.. I checked few other functions
and some have the same problem and some match the function boundary
those that match don't have that first hint instrucion, like:
ffff800010321e40 <do_faccessat>:
ffff800010321e40: 1f 20 03 d5 nop
ffff800010321e44: 1f 20 03 d5 nop
ffff800010321e48: 3f 23 03 d5 hint #25
any hints about hint instructions? ;-)
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists