[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210209203409.1716847-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:34:09 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] netdev-FAQ: answer some questions about the patchwork checks
Point out where patchwork bot's code lives, and that we don't want
people posting stuff that doesn't build.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
index ae2ae37cd921..a64c01b52b4c 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
@@ -272,6 +272,22 @@ user space patches should form separate series (threads) when posted
Posting as one thread is discouraged because it confuses patchwork
(as of patchwork 2.2.2).
+Can I reproduce the checks from patchwork on my local machine?
+--------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Checks in patchwork are mostly simple wrappers around existing kernel
+scripts, the sources are available at:
+
+https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/tree/master/tests
+
+Running all the builds and checks locally is a pain, can I post my patches and have the patchwork bot validate them?
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+No, you must ensure that your patches are ready by testing them locally
+before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance
+gets overloaded very easily and netdev@...r really doesn't need more
+traffic if we can help it.
+
Any other tips to help ensure my net/net-next patch gets OK'd?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Attention to detail. Re-read your own work as if you were the
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists