lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:44:16 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: FAILED unresolved symbol vfs_truncate on arm64 with LLVM

Hi all,

Recently, an issue with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF was reported for arm64:
https://groups.google.com/g/clang-built-linux/c/de_mNh23FOc/m/E7cu5BwbBAAJ

$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- \
                      LLVM=1 O=build/aarch64 defconfig

$ scripts/config \
    --file build/aarch64/.config \
    -e BPF_SYSCALL \
    -e DEBUG_INFO_BTF \
    -e FTRACE \
    -e FUNCTION_TRACER

$ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- \
                      LLVM=1 O=build/aarch64 olddefconfig all
...
FAILED unresolved symbol vfs_truncate
...

My bisect landed on commit 6e22ab9da793 ("bpf: Add d_path helper")
although that seems obvious given that is what introduced
BTF_ID(func, vfs_truncate).

I am using the latest pahole v1.20 and LLVM is at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/14da287e18846ea86e45b421dc47f78ecc5aa7cb
although I can reproduce back to LLVM 10.0.1, which is the earliest
version that the kernel supports. I am very unfamiliar with BPF so I
have no idea what is going wrong here. Is this a known issue?

Cheers,
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ