| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YCQ+d0CVgIclDwng@krava>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:13:43 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: FAILED unresolved symbol vfs_truncate on arm64 with LLVM
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:20:20AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
SNIP
> > but below is change for checking that ftrace addrs are within elf functions
> >
> > seems to work in my tests, I'll run some more tests and send full patch
>
> It seems unnecessarily convoluted. I was thinking about something like
> this (the diff will totally be screwed up by gmail, and I haven't even
> compiled it):
>
> diff --git a/btf_encoder.c b/btf_encoder.c
> index b124ec20a689..8162b238bd43 100644
> --- a/btf_encoder.c
> +++ b/btf_encoder.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,23 @@ get_kmod_addrs(struct btf_elf *btfe, __u64
> **paddrs, __u64 *pcount)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct func_seg { __u64 start; __u64 end; };
> +
> +static int func_exists(struct func_seg *segs, size_t len, __u64 addr)
> +{
> + size_t l = 0, r = len - 1, m;
> +
> + while (l < r) {
> + m = l + (r - l + 1) / 2;
> + if (segs[m].start <= addr)
> + l = m;
> + else
> + r = m - 1;
> + }
> +
> + return segs[l].start <= addr && addr < segs[l].end;
> +}
> +
> static int setup_functions(struct btf_elf *btfe, struct funcs_layout *fl)
> {
> __u64 *addrs, count, i;
> @@ -286,7 +303,7 @@ static int setup_functions(struct btf_elf *btfe,
> struct funcs_layout *fl)
> __u64 addr = kmod ? func->addr + func->sh_addr : func->addr;
>
> /* Make sure function is within ftrace addresses. */
> - if (bsearch(&addr, addrs, count, sizeof(addrs[0]), addrs_cmp)) {
> + if (func_exists(addrs, count, addr))
you pass addrs in here, but you mean func_seg array
filled with elf functions start/end values, right?
> /*
> * We iterate over sorted array, so we can easily skip
> * not valid item and move following valid field into
>
>
> So the idea is to use address segments and check whether there is a
> segment that overlaps with a given address by first binary searching
> for a segment with the largest starting address that is <= addr. And
> then just confirming that segment does overlap with the requested
> address.
>
> WDYT?
I liked the approach below because it got rid of that bsearch ;-)
but yea, yours seems to be less code chage and staighforward
jirka
>
> >
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/btf_encoder.c b/btf_encoder.c
> > index b124ec20a689..548a12847f99 100644
> > --- a/btf_encoder.c
> > +++ b/btf_encoder.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct funcs_layout {
> > struct elf_function {
> > const char *name;
> > unsigned long addr;
> > + unsigned long end;
> > unsigned long sh_addr;
> > bool generated;
> > };
> > @@ -44,7 +45,7 @@ static struct elf_function *functions;
> > static int functions_alloc;
> > static int functions_cnt;
> >
> > -static int functions_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)
> > +static int functions_cmp_name(const void *_a, const void *_b)
> > {
> > const struct elf_function *a = _a;
> > const struct elf_function *b = _b;
> > @@ -52,6 +53,16 @@ static int functions_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)
> > return strcmp(a->name, b->name);
> > }
> >
> > +static int functions_cmp_addr(const void *_a, const void *_b)
> > +{
> > + const struct elf_function *a = _a;
> > + const struct elf_function *b = _b;
> > +
> > + if (a->addr == b->addr)
> > + return 0;
> > + return a->addr < b->addr ? -1 : 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void delete_functions(void)
> > {
> > free(functions);
> > @@ -98,6 +109,7 @@ static int collect_function(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym,
> >
> > functions[functions_cnt].name = name;
> > functions[functions_cnt].addr = elf_sym__value(sym);
> > + functions[functions_cnt].end = (__u64) -1;
> > functions[functions_cnt].sh_addr = sh.sh_addr;
> > functions[functions_cnt].generated = false;
> > functions_cnt++;
> > @@ -236,9 +248,25 @@ get_kmod_addrs(struct btf_elf *btfe, __u64 **paddrs, __u64 *pcount)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool is_addr_in_func(__u64 addr, struct elf_function *func, bool kmod)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * For vmlinux image both addrs[x] and functions[x]::addr
> > + * values are final address and are comparable.
> > + *
> > + * For kernel module addrs[x] is final address, but
> > + * functions[x]::addr is relative address within section
> > + * and needs to be relocated by adding sh_addr.
> > + */
> > + __u64 start = kmod ? func->addr + func->sh_addr : func->addr;
> > + __u64 end = kmod ? func->end+ func->sh_addr : func->end;
> > +
> > + return start <= addr && addr < end;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int setup_functions(struct btf_elf *btfe, struct funcs_layout *fl)
> > {
> > - __u64 *addrs, count, i;
> > + __u64 *addrs, count, i_func, i_addr;
> > int functions_valid = 0;
> > bool kmod = false;
> >
> > @@ -266,43 +294,62 @@ static int setup_functions(struct btf_elf *btfe, struct funcs_layout *fl)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - qsort(addrs, count, sizeof(addrs[0]), addrs_cmp);
> > - qsort(functions, functions_cnt, sizeof(functions[0]), functions_cmp);
> > -
> > /*
> > - * Let's got through all collected functions and filter
> > - * out those that are not in ftrace.
> > + * Sort both functions and addrs so we can iterate
> > + * both of them simultaneously and found matching
> > + * func/addr pairs.
> > */
> > - for (i = 0; i < functions_cnt; i++) {
> > - struct elf_function *func = &functions[i];
> > - /*
> > - * For vmlinux image both addrs[x] and functions[x]::addr
> > - * values are final address and are comparable.
> > - *
> > - * For kernel module addrs[x] is final address, but
> > - * functions[x]::addr is relative address within section
> > - * and needs to be relocated by adding sh_addr.
> > - */
> > - __u64 addr = kmod ? func->addr + func->sh_addr : func->addr;
> > + qsort(addrs, count, sizeof(addrs[0]), addrs_cmp);
> > + qsort(functions, functions_cnt, sizeof(functions[0]), functions_cmp_addr);
> > +
> > + for (i_func = 0, i_addr = 0; i_func < functions_cnt; i_func++) {
> > + struct elf_function *func = &functions[i_func];
> > +
> > + if (i_func + 1 < functions_cnt)
> > + func->end = functions[i_func + 1].addr;
> > +
> > + for (; i_addr < count; i_addr++) {
> > + __u64 addr = addrs[i_addr];
> > +
> > + /* Functions are ahead, catch up with addrs. */
> > + if (addr < func->addr)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* Addr is within function - mark function as valid. */
> > + if (is_addr_in_func(addr, func, kmod)) {
> > + /*
> > + * We iterate over sorted array, so we can easily skip
> > + * not valid item and move following valid field into
> > + * its place, and still keep the 'new' array sorted.
> > + */
> > + if (i_func != functions_valid)
> > + functions[functions_valid] = functions[i_func];
> > + functions_valid++;
> > + i_addr++;
> > + }
> >
> > - /* Make sure function is within ftrace addresses. */
> > - if (bsearch(&addr, addrs, count, sizeof(addrs[0]), addrs_cmp)) {
> > /*
> > - * We iterate over sorted array, so we can easily skip
> > - * not valid item and move following valid field into
> > - * its place, and still keep the 'new' array sorted.
> > + * Addrs are ahead, catch up with functions, or we just
> > + * found valid function and want to move to another.
> > */
> > - if (i != functions_valid)
> > - functions[functions_valid] = functions[i];
> > - functions_valid++;
> > + break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (btf_elf__verbose) {
> > + printf("Found %d functions out of %d symbols and %llu ftrace addresses.\n",
> > + functions_valid, functions_cnt, count);
> > + }
> > +
> > functions_cnt = functions_valid;
> > free(addrs);
> >
> > - if (btf_elf__verbose)
> > - printf("Found %d functions!\n", functions_cnt);
> > + /*
> > + * And finaly sort 'valid' functions by name,
> > + * so find_function can be used.
> > + */
> > + qsort(functions, functions_cnt, sizeof(functions[0]), functions_cmp_name);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -312,7 +359,7 @@ static struct elf_function *find_function(const struct btf_elf *btfe,
> > struct elf_function key = { .name = name };
> >
> > return bsearch(&key, functions, functions_cnt, sizeof(functions[0]),
> > - functions_cmp);
> > + functions_cmp_name);
> > }
> >
> > static bool btf_name_char_ok(char c, bool first)
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists