netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: phy: icplus: use PHY_ID_MATCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YCM9c9L/B8iS4IKi@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:57:07 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: phy: icplus: use PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT()
 for IP101A/G

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:40:44PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> According to the datasheet of the IP101A/G there is no revision field
> and MII_PHYSID2 always reads as 0x0c54. Use PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT() then.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>

Lets hope the datasheet is correct and up to date, because this could
cause a regression if wrong.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew