lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:11:15 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: dsa: xrs700x: add HSR offloading
 support



On 2/9/2021 5:02 PM, George McCollister wrote:
> Add offloading for HSR/PRP (IEC 62439-3) tag insertion, tag removal
> forwarding and duplication supported by the xrs7000 series switches.
> 
> Only HSR v1 and PRP v1 are supported by the xrs7000 series switches (HSR
> v0 is not).
> 
> Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +	val &= ~BIT(dsa_upstream_port(ds, port));
> +	regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(partner->index), val);
> +	regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(port), val);
> +
> +	regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index,
> +			    XRS_PORT_FORWARDING);
> +	regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_FORWARDING);
> +
> +	hsr_pair[0] = port;
> +	hsr_pair[1] = partner->index;
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hsr_pair); i++) {
> +		slave = dsa_to_port(ds, hsr_pair[i])->slave;
> +		slave->features |= XRS7000X_SUPPORTED_HSR_FEATURES;

It's a bit weird to change the supported features while joining, usually
you set them ahead of time to indicate what you are capable of doing and
those can get toggled by user-space to enable/disable said feature, I
suppose the goal here is to influence the HSR data path's decisions to
insert or not tags so this may be okay. This does beg several questions:

- should slave->vlan_features also include that feature set somehow (can
I have a VLAN upper?)
- should there be a notifier running to advertise NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE?
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists