netdev - Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 04/15] net: mvpp2: always compare hw-version vs MVPP21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210211110809.GB1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:08:09 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     stefanc@...vell.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, nadavh@...vell.com, ymarkman@...vell.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, mw@...ihalf.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, atenart@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
        gregory.clement@...tlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 04/15] net: mvpp2: always compare hw-version
 vs MVPP21

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:48:51PM +0200, stefanc@...vell.com wrote:
> @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static bool mvpp2_port_supports_xlg(struct mvpp2_port *port)
>  
>  static bool mvpp2_port_supports_rgmii(struct mvpp2_port *port)
>  {
> -	return !(port->priv->hw_version == MVPP22 && port->gop_id == 0);
> +	return !(port->priv->hw_version != MVPP21 && port->gop_id == 0);

I'm still very much of the opinion (as raised several revisions back)
that using > MVPP21 or >= MVPP22 would be a lot better - especially
when we have situations like this. Having negatives within negatives
does not help readability.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!