[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fc15e5c-efce-d709-7f54-91ea81f7b9cc@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:06:35 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
u9012063@...il.com, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3] selftests/bpf: convert test_xdp_redirect.sh to
bash
On 2021-02-10 21:13, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:45 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
>>
>> The test_xdp_redirect.sh script uses a bash feature, '&>'. On systems,
>> e.g. Debian, where '/bin/sh' is dash, this will not work as
>> expected. Use bash in the shebang to get the expected behavior.
>>
>> Further, using 'set -e' means that the error of a command cannot be
>> captured without the command being executed with '&&' or '||'. Let us
>> use '||' to capture the return value of a failed command.
>>
>> v3: Reintroduced /bin/bash, and kept 'set -e'. (Andrii)
>> v2: Kept /bin/sh and removed bashisms. (Randy)
>>
>> Acked-by: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
>> ---
>
> Not exactly what I had in mind (see below), but it's ok like this as well, so:
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> Does it have to go through the bpf tree or bpf-next is fine? And what
> about Fixes: tag?
>
>
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_redirect.sh | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_redirect.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_redirect.sh
>> index dd80f0c84afb..3f85a82f1c89 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_redirect.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xdp_redirect.sh
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -#!/bin/sh
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> # Create 2 namespaces with two veth peers, and
>> # forward packets in-between using generic XDP
>> #
>> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ cleanup()
>> test_xdp_redirect()
>> {
>> local xdpmode=$1
>> + local ret1=0
>> + local ret2=0
>>
>> setup
>>
>> @@ -57,10 +59,8 @@ test_xdp_redirect()
>> ip link set dev veth1 $xdpmode obj test_xdp_redirect.o sec redirect_to_222 &> /dev/null
>> ip link set dev veth2 $xdpmode obj test_xdp_redirect.o sec redirect_to_111 &> /dev/null
>>
>> - ip netns exec ns1 ping -c 1 10.1.1.22 &> /dev/null
>> - local ret1=$?
>> - ip netns exec ns2 ping -c 1 10.1.1.11 &> /dev/null
>> - local ret2=$?
>> + ip netns exec ns1 ping -c 1 10.1.1.22 &> /dev/null || ret1=$?
>> + ip netns exec ns2 ping -c 1 10.1.1.11 &> /dev/null || ret2=$?
>
> You didn't like
>
> if ip netns exec ns1 ping -c 1 10.1.1.22 &> /dev/null &&
> ip netns exec ns2 ping -c 1 10.1.1.11 &> /dev/null; then
> echo "selftests: test_xdp_redirect $xdpmode [PASS]"
> ...
>
> ?
Ah, yeah that's better. I'll spin a v4 with this and proper fixes-tag.
Thanks, Andrii!
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists