netdev - RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v12 net-next 12/15] net: mvpp2: add BM protection underrun feature support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB3873D8B7BE3AE28A1407C05BB08C9@CO6PR18MB3873.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:22:19 +0000
From:   Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Yan Markman <ymarkman@...vell.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "mw@...ihalf.com" <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        "atenart@...nel.org" <atenart@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        "gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v12 net-next 12/15] net: mvpp2: add BM
 protection underrun feature support


> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: <stefanc@...vell.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:48:17 +0200
> 
> >
> > +static int bm_underrun_protect = 1;
> > +
> > +module_param(bm_underrun_protect, int, 0444);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(bm_underrun_protect, "Set BM underrun protect
> > +feature (0-1), def=1");
> 
> No new module parameters, please.

Ok, I would remove new module parameters.
By the way why new module parameters forbitten?

Thanks,
Stefan